Introducing the HP TouchSmart 610

As much as it might pain some of us to hear it, Apple's iMac really did essentially legitimize the all-in-one as an alternative to the typical desktop-and-monitor combination. There have been Windows-based alternatives here and there historically, but it's only been in the past couple of years that the Windows all-in-one market has really started to gain traction. Of course, the fact that system requirements have also reached a point where a large range of CPUs are still sufficiently fast helps.

At present, the iMac's Windows counterparts also offer a functionality that Apple has yet to duplicate: touch interface. HP adds an additional wrinkle with the TouchSmart 610: a hinge that allows you to slide the unit down and use it "kiosk style". That hinge, along with the latest Intel hardware and a surprisingly high quality screen, suggests a machine intended for myriad uses...not just an all-in-one computer, but an all-markets-in-one appliance. Find out how it performs as we put the TouchSmart 610 to the test.

All the major players have a healthy number of all-in-one systems on the market today, enough so that big box retailers set aside floor space just for them. These systems frequently boast touchscreens, and those screens are almost always sizable. While Apple may have led the market a bit with the iMac, it's the PC vendors who have been experimenting the most with this form factor. The HP TouchSmart 610 is the first of these systems we'll be testing, but we have units from Dell and Toshiba on the way as well. For now, this is what HP's premium all-in-one has to offer:

HP TouchSmart 610 Quad Edition All-in-One Specifications
Processor Intel Core i7-2600
(4x3.4GHz + HTT, 3.8GHz Turbo, 32nm, 8MB L3, 95W)
Chipset Intel H67
Memory 2x4GB Samsung DDR3-1333 SODIMM (Max 4x4GB)
Graphics AMD Radeon HD 5570 2GB DDR3
(400 stream processors, 550/1.6GHz core/memory clocks, 128-bit memory bus)
Display 23" LED Glossy 16:9 1080p
Samsung LTM230HP06
Hard Drive(s) Western Digital Caviar Green 1.5TB 5400-RPM HDD
Optical Drive Slot-loading Blu-ray Writer (HP BD-5841H5)
Networking Realtek PCIe Gigabit Ethernet
Broadcom 802.11b/g/n
Bluetooth 3.0
Audio IDT 92HD89D3 HD Audio
Stereo speakers
Headphone and mic jacks
Front Side Webcam
Speaker grilles
Right Side Slot-loading optical drive
2x HDMI input
Left Side Volume control
SD/MMC/XD/MS Pro card reader
2x USB 2.0
Headphone and mic jacks
Back Side AC jack
Subwoofer jack
5x USB 2.0 (one taken by wireless mouse and keyboard receiver)
Antenna jack for NTSC/OTA ATSC input
Ethernet jack
Operating System Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit
Dimensions 4.06" x 23.02" x 17.72" (WxDxH)
Weight 26.69 lbs
Extras Webcam
Wireless keyboard and mouse
Flash reader (MMC, SD/Mini SD, MS/Duo/Pro/Pro Duo)
Blu-ray writer
Warranty 2-year limited hardware warranty, 1-year limited software
(optional 3-year)
Pricing Starting at $1,399 (including $300 instant rebate)
Price as configured: $1,399

There's a lot going on with the HP TouchSmart 610 Quad Edition. For starters, in its 23" shell HP has outfitted an Intel Core i7-2600 standard, period, and strapped to that four SO-DIMM (read: laptop memory) slots, two of which come equipped with 4GB of DDR3-1333, leaving two more free. The screen itself is most definitely not a TN panel, either. This 23" beast appears to be a 1080p PLS panel (or similar technology) from Samsung, as it has stellar viewing angles and deep, inky blacks. There's none of the shimmer I'm used to seeing from blacks on an IPS panel. Rounding things out is a healthy selection of networking connectivity and a slot-loading blu-ray writer.

Which is why it's unfortunate that HP loses their way in two big areas. The GPU that the TouchSmart 610 comes with by default is the anemic AMD Radeon HD 6450A, but ours (according to the Catalyst Control Center) has the Radeon HD 5570, an upgrade that as of this writing is free of charge. The problem is HP's graphics options for this all-in-one are a mess. Broken down, there's also the Radeon HD 6550A, which is a $30 upgrade that apparently has the exact same specs as our 5570. If you go the NVIDIA route, you can pay $10 more for a GeForce GT 425M (not recommended), an inexplicable $30 for a GeForce G210 (seriously?), and a whopping $50 to add an extra 1GB of video memory to that GT 425M for a total of utterly worthless 2GB.

I'm really hoping what we have is actually the Radeon HD 6550A, since our review unit boasts 2GB of DDR3 video memory while the 5570 offered only comes with 1GB. Either way it's pretty dire: a low 550MHz clock speed on the 400 shaders, and just 1.6GHz on the DDR3 strapped to a 128-bit memory bus. If the 5570 isn't going to cost you anything, go with that; a 5570 offers the same number of shaders (and same architecture, really) by default, and while you lose a gig of video memory, you should theoretically gain 100MHz on the core, making it essentially the fastest graphics option on the 610. Phew.

The other place HP drops the ball is the "free upgrade" to the 1.5TB Western Digital Caviar Green. For mass storage this drive is fine, but as a system drive it's a dog that hamstrings the entire user experience. Given that we only have one hard drive bay, it makes sense to opt for the 1TB 7200-RPM hard drive instead.

Application and Futuremark Performance
Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • WasabiVengeance - Wednesday, November 2, 2011 - link

    When reviewing a product, I'd think it obvious that you should compare it to its actual competitors (iMac). While I realize that some benchmarks can't be easily replicated (gaming), certainly the screen, boot times, and power draw could've been compared.
  • retrospooty - Wednesday, November 2, 2011 - link

    "I'd think it obvious that you should compare it to its actual competitors (iMac"

    What is an iMac ?
  • shin0bi272 - Wednesday, November 2, 2011 - link

    original version

    and the current version

    current one doesnt look too bad but its hella expensive for what you get.
  • retrospooty - Thursday, November 3, 2011 - link

    LOL, thanks... I was being sarcastic though. He said "compare it to actual competitors" so I was clowning on Mac's
  • KoolAidMan1 - Friday, November 4, 2011 - link

    That 27" display by itself is $1100 from Dell or $1400 from NEC. That there's an i5 or i7 computer built in actually makes it a pretty good value.
  • RamarC - Wednesday, November 2, 2011 - link

    i doubt anyone is deciding between this hp touchsmart and an imac. the decision is mac or PC and then which model mac or pc.
  • Spivonious - Wednesday, November 2, 2011 - link

    I can see placing this on a desk in "kiosk" mode and using it as a touch only computer. Does HP have any plans on selling just the screen?
  • Roland00Address - Wednesday, November 2, 2011 - link

    Not the same monitor, but look into the Dell st2220t 21.5 inch CCFL backlit, 6-bit E-IPS. It is 329 and works with any computer that is Vista or 7. It has been on sale routinely for $250 and once as low as $210.
  • jrs77 - Wednesday, November 2, 2011 - link

    Well, I'd actually like a device like that, but the screens are very lacking, especially in the touch-department.

    Resistive touchpanels are crap. Plain and simple. Additionally glossy screens are crap aswell, especially when they're ment to touch.

    So, make one of these with a matte, capacitive multitouch screen and I might actually consider such a system.
    Or even better, make one, that works like a pentablet with pressure-sensitive input like the Wacom Cintiq 24HD.
  • angelzero - Wednesday, November 2, 2011 - link

    Only if this had an Active digitizer it would have been great.

    What's up with all the touch screens now not having active digitizer.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now