Kicking off our look at our vendor cards is the EVGA GeForce GTX 460 768MB SuperClocked. EVGA sent us two of their cards for SLI testing, which also affords us the opportunity to look at the overclocking capabilities of more than 1 of their cards today.

All things considered the hardware of the GTX 460 SuperClocked is identical to our reference cards. It uses the NVIDIA reference PCB (complete with NVIDIA logo) and the NVIDIA reference cooler with EVGA branding. This means that the SuperClocked has the same 2x DVI + 1x mini-HDMI port configuration as the reference cards, the same 3DVision Surround capabilities with in SLI, and the same rear-facing PCIe power plugs.

In fact EVGA keeps things rather simple: there are three things that separate the SuperClocked from any other reference card: the factory overclock, the support, and the included utilities.

Starting with the overclock, the SuperClocked is the first-tier card in EVGA’s factory overclocked lineup, behind the Super-SuperClocked, and the For The Win edition. EVGA ships the SuperClocked at 763MHz core, 950MHz (3.8GHz data rate) memory, giving the card a 13% core overclock and a 5.5% memory overclock. The fact that EVGA is shipping its “mere” SuperClocked card at 763MHz should tell you a lot about just how overclockable the GF104 GPU at the heart of the GTX 460 is – they’ve left room for up to 2 additional speed grades! As we’ll see in our overclocking testing the GTX 460 is quite the overclocker, and the already overclocked EVGA cards are no exception.

As for the support, EVGA is offering two versions of the SuperClocked. The TR version comes with a 2 year warranty, while the AR version which we received comes with a lifetime limited warranty. The difference comes down to $10, with the TR currently retailing for $210 and the AR retailing for $220.

EVGA’s final differentiating feature is their collection of software utilities. EVGA publishes 2 software utilities: EVGA Precision, and the EVGA Overclock Scanner.

EVGA Precision is a freely released overclocking utility based on the classic overclocking utility RivaTuner. As with RivaTuner before it, EVGA Precision is a simplified overclocking utility designed to allow easy overclocking and monitoring of a card, and supports a wide variety of cards including non-EVGA cards. It also includes support for overclocking profiles and an on-screen-display overlay for use in games.

For the version included with the GTX 460, EVGA is defaulting to a new skin with GeForce GTX 460 branding. Unfortunately this is one of the gaudier skins the utility ships with – if you’re more a fan of the KISS principle, we’d strongly suggest using one of a number of other skins included with the utility to give the utility a more orthogonal layout.


With a change of skins, EVGA Precision currently sets the gold standard for an overclocking utility along with MSI’s RivaTuner-derived Afterburner software. Precision is easy to use, light on resources, and in our experience we have never encountered any notable bugs with the utility. It has the features most users should need without going overboard and getting bloated with useless features. At this moment it can’t be beat.

EVGA’s second overclocking utility is the EVGA Overclock Scanner, which we have had the chance to watch evolve throughout the year. In a nutshell, the OC Scanner is a load-generating utility (ala Furmark) which rather than generating a moving image generates a static image. By generating a static image it’s possible for the software to identify any rendering errors in the image that would be indicative of a bad overclock. Or in other words, if you’ve overclocked your card too far, this utility will let you know. Unlike EVGA Precision however, this utility is only for EVGA card owners, specifically owners of GTX 400 series cards.

In our experience with the utility it’s fairly – but not perfectly – accurate. Of our 2 sample cards it properly found 1 unstable overclock that was generating graphical errors without a lockup, while it let us go 10MHz over on the other card which would lockup under Furmark. Overall the utility doesn’t seem to be quite as strenuous as Furmark, so we’d suggest knocking around 10MHz off of whatever EVGA Precision approves to play it safe.

At this point the EVGA Overclock Scanner can only tell if an overclock is stable, but it can’t find an overclock on its own. Currently there’s minimal integration with EVGA Precision (you can launch OC Scanner from within Precision) but we would like to see it evolve in to a self-overclocking utility in the future in order to make overclocking even easier.

Rounding out the package is the obligatory quick start manual, a collection of molex to PCIe power adaptors, a driver/utility CD, a bumper sticker, and thus far the only GTX 400 series card we’ve seen that comes with a mini-HDMI to HDMI adapter.

Index Zotac GeForce GTX 460 1GB
Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • ClownPuncher - Monday, July 12, 2010 - link

    $460 vs $580 you mean! Though, for a 2 card setup, I would say getting a pair of gtx460 is a no brainer at this point.
  • tviceman - Monday, July 12, 2010 - link

    Both AMD and Nvidia have released several updated drivers with performance improvements since the gtx400 series came out. It would be nice if you guys could do a benchmark review of Nvidia's 400 series cards vs. AMD's 5000 series all using the latest drivers so all your readers (including me) can get a clear picture of how each card stands with the most updated drivers.
  • tviceman - Monday, July 12, 2010 - link

    It would be a great, informative article - a very informative article focusing on performance and high end parts with as updated as possible drivers and a quick overview of current prices.
  • Etern205 - Monday, July 12, 2010 - link

    One possible reason why Zotac's attempt at HD5850's cooling at failed is the HD5850 isn't reference cooling doesn't really blow hot air out of the case. If you take a look at a reference card, there will be 2 slit vents located at the top of the card, which also lets hot air out and back into the case.

    Here is a picture of it
  • Etern205 - Monday, July 12, 2010 - link

    Sorry, link is not working...
    Correct link
  • setzer - Monday, July 12, 2010 - link

    One question, why still use the 10.3a drivers? Even if you say performance hasn't changed (part 1), it's only fit to compare latest drivers to latest drivers.
  • d4a2n0k - Monday, July 12, 2010 - link

    Because they just use the numbers from previous benchmarks and those were the drivers used at that time.
  • Ryan Smith - Monday, July 12, 2010 - link

    Basically this. I do spot checking on new drivers to find performance differences, but I don't run every last test on every last card on every driver (a full NV+AMD rebench is over a weeks' labor). For that reason 10.3a is listed since that's the driver version those numbers came from. Listing 10.6 would be dishonest even if the numbers are the same as we haven't tested every single configuration with 10.6.
  • tviceman - Monday, July 12, 2010 - link

    Which is why it would be great to get a re-evaluation of both AMD's 5800 series and Nvidia's 40 series all with the latest drivers. Both camps have released come out with several driver revisions stating mild to moderate performance gains in many of today's games. It would give an excellent indication as to how far both camps have come along since they released their cards, and most important it would give a more clear indication as to how performance is right now, as opposed to recycling months old benchmarks.
  • Ryan Smith - Tuesday, July 13, 2010 - link

    The numbers from the 10.3a drivers are still accurate for the 10.6 drivers. Or in other words, the performance "right now" is the same.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now