System Performance

Not all motherboards are created equal. On the face of it, they should all perform the same and differ only in the functionality they provide - however, this is not the case. The obvious pointers are power consumption, but also the ability for the manufacturer to optimize USB speed, audio quality (based on audio codec), POST time and latency. This can come down to manufacturing process and prowess, so these are tested.

For Z390 we are running an updated version of our test suite, including OS and CPU cooler. This has some effect on our results.

Power Consumption

Power consumption was tested on the system while in a single ASUS GTX 980 GPU configuration with a wall meter connected to the Thermaltake 1200W power supply. This power supply has ~75% efficiency > 50W, and 90%+ efficiency at 250W, suitable for both idle and multi-GPU loading. This method of power reading allows us to compare the power management of the UEFI and the board to supply components with power under load, and includes typical PSU losses due to efficiency. These are the real world values that consumers may expect from a typical system (minus the monitor) using this motherboard.

While this method for power measurement may not be ideal, and you feel these numbers are not representative due to the high wattage power supply being used (we use the same PSU to remain consistent over a series of reviews, and the fact that some boards on our test bed get tested with three or four high powered GPUs), the important point to take away is the relationship between the numbers. These boards are all under the same conditions, and thus the differences between them should be easy to spot.

Power: Long Idle (w/ GTX 980)Power: OS Idle (w/ GTX 980)Power: Prime95 Blend (w/ GTX 980)

For a flagship motherboard, the Supermicro C9Z390-PGW displays quite efficent power draw when at full load. It's consistent with other models at long idle and in idle states when tested with our power hungry i7-8700K test bed chip.

Non-UEFI POST Time

Different motherboards have different POST sequences before an operating system is initialized. A lot of this is dependent on the board itself, and POST boot time is determined by the controllers on board (and the sequence of how those extras are organized). As part of our testing, we look at the POST Boot Time using a stopwatch. This is the time from pressing the ON button on the computer to when Windows starts loading. (We discount Windows loading as it is highly variable given Windows specific features.)

Non UEFI POST Time

The Supermicro C9Z390-PGW represents one of the slowest boards recorded in our POST time test. Supermicro doesn't have a good record in this regard as three out of four LGA 1151 boards that we've tested sit at the bottom. 

DPC Latency

Deferred Procedure Call latency is a way in which Windows handles interrupt servicing. In order to wait for a processor to acknowledge the request, the system will queue all interrupt requests by priority. Critical interrupts will be handled as soon as possible, whereas lesser priority requests such as audio will be further down the line. If the audio device requires data, it will have to wait until the request is processed before the buffer is filled.

If the device drivers of higher priority components in a system are poorly implemented, this can cause delays in request scheduling and process time. This can lead to an empty audio buffer and characteristic audible pauses, pops and clicks. The DPC latency checker measures how much time is taken processing DPCs from driver invocation. The lower the value will result in better audio transfer at smaller buffer sizes. Results are measured in microseconds.

Deferred Procedure Call Latency

None of the LGA 1151 motherboards tested so far has been optimized for DPC latency. The C9Z390-PGW sits middle of the road with a result of 127 ns; it performs just better than the MSI MEG Z390 ACE and sits below the ROG STRIX Z370-F Gaming.

Board Features, Test Bed and Setup CPU Performance, Short Form
Comments Locked

42 Comments

View All Comments

  • colonelclaw - Wednesday, February 6, 2019 - link

    For the last 12 years or so I've been exclusively buying Asus motherboards for desktop machines, and Supermicro motherboards for servers & rendernodes. Very roughly 25 of the former and 30 of the latter. So far I've had zero failures. The older of the Supermicro boards have seen 24/7 use for about 8 years!
  • althaz - Tuesday, February 5, 2019 - link

    Their build quality remains excellent. Their efforts in VRMs in recent times (if you're in to heavy overclocking) are a different story though. Gigabyte's range is utterly dominant there at the moment (although their UEFI really sucks in terms of UX).

    Personally, Asus have usually been the boards I've ended up opting for. Gigabyte's boards are better overclockers and have better power delivery and NOBODY has worse service...but they just nail everything else.

    That said, I'm planning on a new build later in the year (hopefully with Zen 2/Ryzen 3000, but let's see how it turns out first) and am currently leaning towards a Gigabyte board.
  • Questor - Thursday, February 7, 2019 - link

    I have been using EVGA motherboards for some time now with excellent results. What can I say? I run away from the crowds.

    Big problem now is, I want to build a Ryzen system with the upcoming CPUs. I am going to have to return to the mainstream 4. It scares me.
  • bunnyfubbles - Tuesday, February 5, 2019 - link

    Supermicro has been known for server and workstation motherboards, so the idea is that they are obviously going after the common "work hard, play hard" manifesto that has been around for ages
  • CoryS - Friday, February 1, 2019 - link

    THis has everything I would ever want in a board. I even like the styling (after that dumb tag lien is covered up by components). Except it doesn't have Thunderbolt 3. Why is this so hard to find in a desktop system? Surely they could had dropped some USB 3.1 ports for at least one?
  • GreenReaper - Friday, February 1, 2019 - link

    Licensing it probably comes with a covenant not to sue Intel.
  • Freeb!rd - Friday, February 1, 2019 - link

    Actually, Intel dropped licensing on Thunder turd 3... probably because no one would pay for it... and they didn't want the turd to shrivel up and die, yet.
  • GreenReaper - Sunday, February 3, 2019 - link

    No, they stopped *charging* for it, per-item. It's royalty-free and non-exclusive but still licensed.

    We don't know the exact terms under which that license is granted, but I wouldn't be surprised if certification was required and that the license might be revoked if action was taken against Intel.

    One interesting fact from https://thunderbolttechnology.net/tech/certificati... - "Peripheral devices are certified to be compatible with specific operating systems and *the devices are not end user upgradeable* for additional operating system compatibility." Not sure if this is just Intel covering their ass for incompatibility or an actual restriction on licensees providing user-upgradability.
  • Tecnoc - Friday, February 1, 2019 - link

    As far as I know while the PLX chip allows for x8/x8/x8/x8 SLI is not supported. Does SLI have to be officially supported to work?
  • blppt - Friday, February 1, 2019 - link

    The truly bizarre thing about this motherboard's existance is that SLI and CF are seeing little support in new titles lately, and last I checked you have to get hacked nvidia drivers to support more than 2 cards in SLI for the 10+ series anyways.

    Might have been useful 5-10 years ago when AFR mGPU support didn't stink so much.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now