Hardware Setup and Platform Analysis

The internal components of the 4X4 BOX-V1000M are packed densely together. The front panel's two USB 2.0 ports are enabled by a daughterboard connecting to the motherboard's USB 2.0 headers. The mounting for this daughterboard, and the SATA port / cable location make the installation of the DDR4 SODIMMs a challenging process. In fact, based on my experience, it is better to completely take out the daughterboard prior to the SODIMM installation process. Installing a 2.5" drive is fortunately not as painful, as it is similar to the installation process in the tall NUCs from Intel, and the SATA cable is already in place inside the chassis.


(Annotation on photograph sourced from Hermitage Akihabara)

The rest of the internal components are the usual suspects in a NUC targeting industrial applications - a Realtek ALC233 audio codec, an Exar SP339E serial port transceiver, and a couple of Raltek RTL8111G gigabit Ethernet controllers on one side, and a 60mm fan on top of a copper heat sink on the other side.

Once the build components were in place, it was a fairly uneventful process to complete the OS installation. The UEFI BIOS of the 4X4 BOX-V1000M is quite basic - consumers used to ASRock's fancy GUI and plethora of value additions are bound to be disappointed with the spartan AMI BIOS interface in this ASRock Industrial system. The gallery below shows the various available BIOS options.

The block diagram of the Ryzen Embedded V-Series SoC is presented below.

The V1605B specifically provides:

  • 2x 10GbE
  • 1x USB 2.0
  • 1x USB 3.1 Gen1
  • 4x USB 3.1 Gen2
  • 2x SATA III

The 4X4 BOX-V1000M does not use the 10GbE interfaces. It also uses the single USB 2.0 port of the SoC to drive a header on the board that enables a daughterboard downstream to provide 2x USB 2.0 ports in the front panel. The USB 3.2 Gen 1 port and one of the USB 3.1 Gen 2 ports of the SoC are left unused. Networking support is provided using PCIe lanes.

The AIDA64 system report for our 4X4 BOX-V1000M configuration provides a breakdown of the usage of the PCIe lanes and adds additional context to the above block diagram:

  • PCIe 3.0 x4 and a SATA port multiplexed behind the M.2 2242/2260 slot
  • PCIe 3.0 x1 for the Intel Wireless-AC AC3168 WLAN card
  • PCIe 3.0 x1 for the Realtek RTL8111G #1
  • PCIe 3.0 x1 for the Realtek RTL8111G #2

The absence of a discrete PCH means that there is no 'DMI bottleneck' at play in the SoC. Another interesting aspect is the support for four simultaneous 4Kp60 display outputs from the V1605B. The 4X4 BOX-V1000 only supports three, though, with two DP 1.2a ports and a HDMI 2.0a port.

In the remainder of this review, we will first look at various UL benchmarks, followed by miscellaneous workloads. A detailed look at the HTPC credentials of the system is followed by testing of the power consumption and thermal solution. In our recent system reviews, we have usually started off with BAPCo's SYSmark 2018 - unfortunately, we ran into some showstopper issues with the 4X4 BOX-V1000M review configuration, as the benchmark program consistently errored out (mostly during the Photoshop CC workload component). We had seen similar problems in previous AMD-based PCs that ended up getting resolved with driver updates, but we had no such luck with this system. Incidentally, with the same GPU drivers, we were able to get the workload processed correctly on an ECS LIVA A320 sporting an AMD Athlon 3000G processor. Debugging the issue on the 4X4 BOX-V1000M beyond a few attempts was beyond the scope of this review. Hence, we decided to drop the attempt to publish SYSmark 2018 numbers for the 4x4 BOX-V1000M. 

Introduction and Product Impressions UL Benchmarks - PCMark and 3DMark
POST A COMMENT

37 Comments

View All Comments

  • Mogvil 20 - Monday, October 19, 2020 - link

    If users having some issue or facing some kind of trouble in RushCard Activation then users can Activate RushCard with us. And if users want to activate their Rush Card with us users didn’t have to do more hard things RushCard Activation. Users can activate their Rush Card with us in the minimum time possible.

    http://philagribiz.com/rush-card-activation/
    Reply
  • Spunjji - Tuesday, September 29, 2020 - link

    The fact that AMD can/could still make these cheaply at GloFo without having any effect on their ability to produce Zen 2 parts probably plays a large part. The processors are doubtless available in higher volumes than Renoir. Reply
  • 5080 - Monday, September 28, 2020 - link

    Don't forget, they also offer a 4x4 with the new Ryzen 4000U mobile APU's. You can choose from a R3-4300U, R5-4500U or the top of the line R7- 4800U. Standard configuration includes two LAN ports a 2.5GB Ethernet and 1GB, USB 3.2, M.2 2280 and SO-DIMM 3200.
    https://www.asrockind.com/4X4%20BOX-4800U
    Reply
  • casteve - Monday, September 28, 2020 - link

    I agree, It's the 4000U series that should provide a compelling solution for these mini-PCs. I look forward to reviews of the Asrock boxes as well as Asus and others. Reply
  • deil - Monday, September 28, 2020 - link

    I with this thing would have a bit more metal on cooler/metal shroud on the fan. It's so close to being virtually silent and it's sad that even this chip was slightly throttled.
    I guess its modding time.
    Reply
  • PixyMisa - Monday, September 28, 2020 - link

    Yes, I thought I remembered seeinh a news item about that recently. Hope they can sent AnandTech one to review soon. Reply
  • PyroHoltz - Monday, September 28, 2020 - link

    Good find, big disappointed that they didn't review these new offerings. Reply
  • PyroHoltz - Monday, September 28, 2020 - link

    Off topic, where's the Anand Ampere review? Reply
  • shabby - Monday, September 28, 2020 - link

    Ian said Ryan is delayed due to the wildfires on the west coast. Reply
  • PyroHoltz - Monday, September 28, 2020 - link

    Thanks, I hadn't read that. The fires are pretty bad here in CA, hope everyone's okay. Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now