Over the past several years AnandTech has grown to be much more than just a PC hardware review site. In fact, we consider ourselves to be just as much about the new mobile world as we do about the old PC world. We leveraged our understanding of component and system architecture in bringing a deeper, more analytical look to mobile silicon and devices. As we continued to invest in our mobile coverage and expertise, we found that readers, mobile component and device makers responded quite well to our approach.
AnandTech’s focus grew, but we quickly ran into a bottleneck when it came time to monetize that mobile content. Our mobile content did a great job of helping to grow the site (as well as bring new eyeballs to our traditional PC coverage as well). While we had no issues competing with larger corporate owned sites on the content front, when it came to advertising we were at a disadvantage. Our advantage in quality allowed us to make progress, but ultimately it became a numbers game. The larger corporate owned sites could show up with a network of traffic, substantially larger than what AnandTech could deliver, and land more lucrative advertising deals than we were able to. They could then in turn fund a larger editorial operation and the cycle continues.
AnandTech has been profitable since its inception; it’s been on a great growth curve these past couple of years and we’ve always been able to do more with less, but lately there’s been an increased investment in high quality content. It wasn’t that long ago where the only type of content seeing real investment was shallow, poorly researched and ultimately very cable-TV-news-like. More recently however we’ve seen a shift. Higher quality content is being valued and some big names (both on the publishing and VC fronts) have been investing in them. Honestly we haven’t seen a world like this in probably over a decade.
Before his departure, Anand spent almost a year meeting with all of the big names in the publishing space, both traditional and new media players. The goal was to find AnandTech a home with a partner that had a sustainable business model (similar to AnandTech’s), but could add the investment and existing reach to allow the site to better realize its potential. That search led to a number of interesting potential partners; it was a refreshing experience to say the least knowing that there are groups in the world who really value good content. Ultimately that search brought AnandTech to Purch.
Purch met the requirements: they have a sustainable business model, are profitable and have the sort of reach AnandTech needs to really hit the next level. More fundamentally however, Purch’s values are in line with AnandTech’s. In fact, it wasn’t that long ago that Purch acquired one of AnandTech’s biggest competitors in the late 1990s: Tom’s Hardware. Purch had already demonstrated a value for the sort of deep, long form content AnandTech was known for. In meeting with the Purch business and editorial teams, there was a clear interest in further developing AnandTech’s strengths as well as feeding back AnandTech’s learnings into the rest of the Purch family.
AnandTech and Tom’s Hardware remain editorially independent, and though no longer competitors, the goal is to learn from one another. To further invest in the areas that make us different, and together with the rest of the Purch family help to bring a higher standard of quality to the web.
The AnandTech team is staying in place and will continue to focus on existing coverage areas. We’re not changing our editorial policies or analytical approach and have no intentions of doing so. The one thing that will change is our ability to continue to grow the site. This if anything starts from the top; with a publisher to more directly handle the business of AnandTech, this frees me up to spend more time on content creation and helping the rest of our editors put together better articles. And in a hands-on business like journalism that benefit cannot be overstated.
AnandTech was an incredibly powerful force as an independent publisher, but it now joins a family whose combined traffic is eight times larger than what AnandTech was on its own. Our goal is to continue to invest in what we feel is the right approach to building high quality content; now we have an even greater ability to do just that.
345 Comments
View All Comments
Moricon - Wednesday, December 17, 2014 - link
YOU ARE KIDDING!!!No seriously, you are kidding right?
Toms Hard Ware - Sister to TOMS HARD WARE, that crap filled ad ridden tracker infested excuse of a so called tech site ( as of today Toms Hardware Home Page alone connects to 107 third party sites, 107, yes that's ONE HUNDRED AND SEVEN connections to third parties on ONE PAGE!).
Oh Dear RIP Anandtech it was fun whilst it lasted. you are oficially removed from my Favorites, good luck and well done on selling out down the road to junk status in the community!
Peter Witt - Wednesday, December 17, 2014 - link
"I'll be getting off at Southampton, Darlings. I'll be catching a later voyage to New York on some other ship. Happy sailing!"npp - Wednesday, December 17, 2014 - link
I can't help noticing how often the term "ads" pops up in previous staff comments. Better ads, more editors, more quality. Go check silent pc review, they haven't even reskinned the site for quite a while, and still remain the de facto standard in the field they explore. Owners, ads, opportunities, leave this bs for those who care, which is not the (majority of the) people that praise anandtech for its quality. I really liked the donut theory comment above, says it all.Ultimately as a user I don't decide which ads I get, or which crap company buys one of the best tech sites on the internet, I decide whether to visit the site or not. I wasn't sold on all the talk about how Anand leaving the site is actually a good thing. I'm not sold on "being owned by a bigger is better", either. If the site declines, I'll stop coming back. What's wrong with you people, wanting to turn every decent site out there into a freakin cash machine.
Impulses - Wednesday, December 17, 2014 - link
It's relatively easy for Silent PC to remain at the top of their game when they cover such a laser focused niche tho... I like the way AT's content has expanded, specially over the last six years, but it was always clear they lacked the resources and man hours to do ALL they really wanted (whether it was review more phones, more enterprise stuff, have more gear on hand for comparisons, etc).I'm cautiously optimistic, they've earned that much IMO, even if I won't touch THG with a ten foot pole.
dannoddd - Wednesday, December 17, 2014 - link
Congrats Anandtech, I hope it works out in the best possible way for you guys. Anandtech is one of the top sites around and I trust you'll continue to push top notch articles and reviews. People always freak and overreact to change. For those of you panicking, just realize the full disclosure at this point in the venture shows the ongoing character that has caused us to trust this crew in the first place. I hope to see the site expand and for all of you to benefit professionally and personally.dstarr3 - Wednesday, December 17, 2014 - link
Oh no. Tom's Hardware is such shit. I don't want Anandtech to turn to shit, too. :-(yefi - Wednesday, December 17, 2014 - link
Goodbye.leetruski - Wednesday, December 17, 2014 - link
The fact that Purch owns Tom's Hardware says everything. Bye Felicia.Yorgos - Wednesday, December 17, 2014 - link
Bullshit,xbitlabs is DEAD,
Tom's has become a pile of crap,
AnandTech's been sold to the company that made tom's a pile of crap.
Phoronix has this irritating dude, but he has a few good things on his site,
Slashdot is horribly annoying with those new banners, new looks....
Dailytech lately is being irritating too, I like the stupidity the articles are being written... it's more entertaining to me than irritating.
TPU, holds still,
Videocardz is wonderfull,
Fudzilla is still wonderfull.
well, there are still sites that offer a descent content.
There is a shitload of people who could make this site a community driven/funded site, or at least since it has a healthy status it could've been managed/acquired by it's employees, but instead let's take an arrow in the knee and talk business.
I'm off the ship too.
Makaveli - Wednesday, December 17, 2014 - link
Not like this!