If we'd never heard the name Sandy, we'd have featured two live blogs today, and had a few hours to spend with the latest members of the Nexus family. Sadly, Google's event was canceled and so we're left with press images and specifications. But that doesn't mean there isn't plenty to discuss, so let's get started. 

The Nexus 4

The Nexus program has always had three components: a platform, an OEM and new software. The platform is the SoC and other internal hardware components that define the performance characteristics Google would like to see all manufacturers pursue. The OEM partner works with Google in design and features, and, of course, manufacturing and packaging. At times the platform and OEM have fit hand in glove, with the platform and design hewn from an existing product. We saw this in the Nexus One, which mirrored the hardware HTC was offering in the Droid Incredible and several other models. We saw this again with the Nexus S, which was strikingly similar to Samsung's Galaxy S, within and without. The Galaxy Nexus was a strange departure, owing its internals to a platform preferred by Motorola, but with a design that foretold Samsung's next iteration of the Galaxy S family. And now, there's the Nexus 4, which could have easily been called the Optimus Nexus or the Nexus G, were it not for Google finding a nomenclature they liked. 

Looking at the LG Optimus G's spec sheet alongside that of the Nexus 4 could leave one a bit bemused at how little has really changed. The same SoC, RAM, display, connectivity and battery configuration are shared by both devices. The Nexus 4 adds wireless charging, and wireless display courtesy of the Miracast standard. The design is familiar, but distinct; taking the hard lines of the rather square Optimus and softening them to form the Nexus. But much of the distinction comes in two key areas: price and software.

Nexus 4 and LG Optimus G Comparison
Device Nexus 4 LG Optimus G
SoC 1.5 GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro
(APQ8064: 4 x Krait + Adreno 320)
1.5 GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Pro
(APQ8064: 4 x Krait + Adreno 320)
RAM/NAND/Expansion 2 GB LPDDR2, 8/16 GB NAND, no microSD 2 GB LPDDR2, 16 GB NAND, 16 GB microSD
Display 4.7" WXGA TrueHD IPS Plus (1280x768) with In-Cell Touch 4.7" WXGA TrueHD IPS Plus (1280x768) with In-Cell Touch
Network Pentaband 2G / 3G (Uncertain baseband) 2G / 3G / 4G LTE (Qualcomm MDM9615 UE Category 3 LTE)
Dimensions 133.9mm x 68.7mm x 9.1mm, 139 grams 131.9mm x 68.9mm x 8.45mm, 145 grams
Camera 8.0 MP Rear Facing, 1.3 MP Front Facing 13.0 MP or 8.0 MP Rear Facing, 1.3 MP Front Facing
Battery 2100 mAh 3.8V (7.98 Whr) 2100 mAh 3.8V (7.98 Whr)
OS Android 4.2 Android 4.0.x
Connectivity 802.11b/g/n + BT 4.0, USB2.0, GPS/GNSS, MHL, DLNA, NFC, Miracast wireless display 802.11b/g/n + BT 4.0, USB2.0, GPS/GNSS, MHL, DLNA, NFC

In lieu of a drastic overhaul of Jelly Bean, this point advance refines various features we've already seen. Photo Sphere expands the panorama function to generate a composite that includes frames in multiple axes, resulting in an image similar to those you find in Google's Street View. A new text input option comes with Gesture Typing, which mimics Swype's mechanism of having the user glide their finger between target letters. Miracast is enabled with the update, which serves as an answer to Apple's AirPlay, though the ubiquity of Apple TV trumps that of Miracast-enabled displays. Quick Actions for Notifications and Google Now have been expanded and the Google Search results are now graced by their Knowledge Graph. LG will certainly work to have Android 4.2 ready for their Optimus G, before too long, but the Nexus 4's present exclusivity, and promise of future updates gives it an edge. 

Then there's price. The Nexus One premiered with impressive specs for the time and was a shot across the bow by Google against the US carriers. By tying us to lengthy contracts, US carriers maintain all of the agency for device selection, pricing and software bloat. By offering a halo phone from their own store, and selling it unlocked, Google offered an alternative. There were a few problems, though, with the price chief among them. At $529 off-contract, the Nexus One was priced similarly to other off-contract devices, but was far in excess of what consumers typically spend on even high-end devices. So, the experiment was a bit of a failure, with most off-contract buyers being enthusiasts and technophiles. 

The LG Optimus G is available through AT&T off-contract for an oddly familiar $549, while the Nexus 4 sheds $250 from the price along with 8 GB of NAND and the microSD slot. We'll refrain from making a to-do about the storage limitations, and focus on the unprecedented value that this device offers. And this makes it the shot across the bow for which the Nexus One was intended. But there's a different cost: LTE.

The GSM/HSPA networks that dominate internationally, and are featured here with AT&T and T-Mobile, offer interoperability across certain limited bands. The result is that a pentaband device can operate on nearly any GSM/HSPA network in the world. LTE interoperability is a rat's nest that may never be solved. Many more bands can be utilized and for those carrier's with legacy CDMA networks there remains a certification process that must be undergone by new hardware and software. The result is that no one device would operate on the panoply of networks in the US alone, and couldn't operate on several of them at all without direct involvement by the carriers. So, in order to maintain independence from the carrier taint, Google omits LTE and foregoes CDMA2000 networks like Verizon or Sprint. 

Does lacking the most modern air interface make this a lame duck? That's for you to decide. This remains the highest bang for your buck we've seen in an off-contract phone. At least on paper. We'll see how things look for sure in the review. 

The Nexus 10

Samsung's involvement in the second Nexus tablet comes at an interesting time in the Android tablet market. The iPad's success persists like a runaway freight train; updated hardware and a new form factor seem almost superfluous to the knowledge that the iPad will sell millions of units before the holidays. Despite previously flagging sales and market enthusiasm, the Nexus 7 and Kindle Fire demonstrated that there's life in the Android tablet market. So, with portability and affordability seemingly of paramount concern to tablet buyers, what's the place of a high-end, 10" tablet? 

The Nexus 10 marries the highest resolution display found on any tablet, with the latest CPU and GPU from ARM's design works. The SoC is the long awaited Exynos 5 Dual, the first with ARM's Cortex-A15 cores, and Mali-T604 GPU. Anand's been chugging away at the review for the most recent Chromebook, the first device to feature the Exynos 5 Dual, and will dig deep into the performance of the hardware, so we'll save plenty for that. I will mention again, though, that one of the key features of the SoC is the enormous memory bandwidth. 

When Apple introduced the Retina display on the iPad (early 2012) we explored the importance of memory bandwidth to be able to generate all those pixels at a high frame rate. For Apple the solution in the A5X was to develop a configuration of four 32-bit channels connected to LP-DDR2 memory with a 400 MHz clock. The resulting bandwidth was an impressive 12.8 GB/s. The Exynos 5 Dual matches that figure, but does so with half the channels at twice the clocks while utilizing low-voltage DDR3 memory (2x32bit @800 MHz). 

Where the Nexus 10 matches the iPad for memory bandwidth, it exceeds it in resolution. There was a time not so long ago that resolutions of 2560x1600 (WQXGA) were the stuff of 27" and 30" monitors, intended for workstations and gaming enthusiasts. As of November 13th, though, you'll find it in a 10" tablet weighing in at under two-thirds of a kilogram. We're sticklers for waiting till we've dissected things before we sing their praises, but historically, Samsung's done good things with these PLS devices in their tablets. 

Android 4.2 is on board, with a few tweaks for the tablet set. A new multi-user option will allow multiple people to share a tablet with each user given their own configuration and data. It will be interesting to see the way this is implemented, how resources and storage are shared amongst users, how apps common to multiple users are handled. 

With so much performance and so many pixels on hand, the Nexus 10 is a clear grab for iPad sales. Whether it sees success similar to the Nexus 7 may depend in part on pricing. At $399 for the 16 GB model, and $499 for the 32 GB model, the Nexus 10 undercuts the iPad by $100 across the board. Does that price make the Nexus 10 a clear recommendation of the recently updated iPad? We'll have to wait and see. 

Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • Lugaidster - Tuesday, October 30, 2012 - link

    I think you're a little lost. The iPhone 5 in all it's versions won't even support half the LTE markets (counted as countries) in the world. We have LTE rolling out in a few weeks and the iPhone 5 doesn't even have a version that works with it (and that's with two bands!).

    I'm on the GSM bandwagon until a useful replacement appears. No voice and data? Shitty battery life? No global coverage? No thank you. I can practically go to any country in the world with my gsm phone, buy a prepaid sim-card and have everything I need on my phone just like at home. My current Atrix served me in SE. Asia, Japan, Oceania, Spain and France, and most of S. America. About the only place that had LTE was Australia when I visited, and I couldn't care less about not having 50mbps. 10mbps is enough for me on the phone.

    I can get the sd-slot gripes, but not the LTE ones (At least not for now anyway). Besides, the usual speeds for most countries home broadband services are within HSPA+ reach. Maybe a couple of years down the road it might matter. But I don't really care about that now.
  • doobydoo - Tuesday, October 30, 2012 - link

    'It literally is IMPOSSIBLE to get a fully carrier-unlocked phone with LTE support'

    Yeah, OK. That's why every other manufacturer managed it (and even LG managed it).
  • ImSpartacus - Tuesday, October 30, 2012 - link

    I think you may be mistaken. Apple's LTE iPhone has three versions while it's non-LTE iPhone had one single world-wide version. Samsung's GS3 has more than one version just to cover US LTE carriers. HTC had to make a different One X to make it onto AT&T's LTE.

    Those three manufacturers had to make multiple versions of their halo phones because it's impossible to make a fully carrier-unlocked phone with global LTE support at this time.
  • doobydoo - Tuesday, October 30, 2012 - link

    Actually, it has 2 versions. One of which has an element which can be enabled/disabled.

    Are you trying to claim Google can't do the same? Making 2 phones is beyond them? Please.

    I can buy an iPhone, where I am, which is fully carrier unlocked, with LTE. That alone factually proves the original claim wrong. Period.

    The fact that for other people to be able to do the same may require another model is Googles problem to solve, not the consumers to suffer for.
  • Despoiler - Thursday, November 1, 2012 - link

    You don't seem to understand that Apple dictates to Verizon when their iOS releases are launched. No other phone manufacturer gets that right. Verizon has routinely scrapped or delayed Android OS updates because it found some thing in the release that it's QA flagged as not acceptable. The only reason Verizon can even do that is because CDMA is built around carrier control.

    The Nexus is a development phone so Verizon dictating to Google what, when, and where it can do OS upgrades defeats the purpose of development. As Verizon does this a lot t of it's LTE Gnex users have unlocked the bootloader, rooted, and ROM'd it making the phone useless for development. They dropped LTE because they dropped Verizon.
  • Zambollo - Tuesday, October 30, 2012 - link

    According to Qualcomm, this chip (APQ8064 ) should have GLONASS, but there is no mention of that???
  • peroni - Tuesday, October 30, 2012 - link

    I wonder if GNSS is meant to be Glonass?
  • ImSpartacus - Tuesday, October 30, 2012 - link

    GNSS is Glonass, GPS and a few other satellite services.
  • dishayu - Tuesday, October 30, 2012 - link

    My knowledge could be out of date here but GPS chip is seperate from the SOC as far as i know (APQ8064 in this case).
  • chrone - Tuesday, October 30, 2012 - link

    Dear Anand and The Gang,

    Please do a storage performance benchmark as what you did on last Nexus 7" review. Would love to see whether there's improvement on the storage side. :)

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now