The SSD Relapse: Understanding and Choosing the Best SSD
by Anand Lal Shimpi on August 30, 2009 12:00 AM EST- Posted in
- Storage
Tying it All Together: SSD Performance Degradation
More spare area is better for random workloads, but desktop workloads aren’t random enough to justify setting aside more spare area to improve performance; most reviews don’t test in a used state, and more users would simply flock to lower price-per-GB drives with less spare area.
Drives that drop the most in performance from new to used state have the most to gain from the TRIM instruction. Depending on how you use your drive of course:
| % Performance Drop in Used State vs. New State | |||
| 4KB Random Write | 2MB Sequential Write | PCMark Vantage HDD Suite | |
| Intel X25-E 64GB (SLC) | 26.1% | 5.4% | 9.7% |
| Intel X25-M G1 160GB (MLC) | 35.5% | 3.8% | 16.7% |
| Intel X25-M G2 160GB (MLC) | 0.7% | 2.2% | 15.3% |
| OCZ Agility 128GB (Indilinx MLC) | 44.8% | 15.0% | 4.4% |
| OCZ Summit 256GB (Samsung MLC) | 72.4% | 3.0% | 23.6% |
| OCZ Vertex EX 128GB (Indilinx SLC) | 60.5% | 20.8% | 0.8% |
| OCZ Vertex Turbo 128GB (Indilinx MLC) | 44.0% | 15.4% | 4.5% |
| Patriot Torqx 128GB (Indilinx MLC) | 44.6% | 15.6% | 3.5% |
Depending on the scenario, all three controllers have a lot to gain from TRIM. Random write performance drops significantly for almost every single drive. The worst is the Samsung RBB controller, which lost over 70% of its performance between new and used states; Samsung needs TRIM.
Intel made some significant improvements going from the G1 to G2 drives, the new drive loses no performance in our random write test. This is thanks to firmware tweaks and having twice as much DRAM to track data in; the more data the Intel drive can keep track of, the better it is at organization, management and garbage collection. From a pure performance standpoint, the G2 might actually be better for server workloads than the X25-E. In terms of lifespan however, the X25-E has the G2 beat.
Only the Indilinx drives lose an appreciable amount of performance in the sequential write test, but they are the only drives to not lose any performance in the more real-world PCMark Vantage HDD suite. Although not displayed here, the overall PCMark Vantage score takes an even smaller hit on Indilinx drives. This could mean that in the real world, Indilinx drives stand to gain the least from TRIM support. This is possibly due to Indilinx using a largely static LBA mapping scheme; the only spare area is then the 6.25% outside of user space regardless of how used the drive is.
Both Samsung and Intel have a lot to gain from TRIM. Samsung’s performances goes from utterly unacceptable to reasonable (but not price justified) with TRIM. Intel’s performance goes from class-leading to more, er, class-leading.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
295 Comments
View All Comments
Abjuk - Wednesday, September 2, 2009 - link
Agreed CM, my current project at work takes about six minutes to build from scratch and CPU usage never gets above about 35%. The process is totally IO bound.It really depends on whether you have several large source files or several hundred small ones.
Weyzer - Tuesday, September 1, 2009 - link
Good article and testing, but why was the Crucial M225 not mentioned at all? It's performance is similar to the vertex drives, I know, but I think it could have been mentioned somewhere, if it is in the good or bad range.jasperjones - Tuesday, September 1, 2009 - link
javascript:link('frmText') $997 @ Newegg omgomgomgNeedless to say, that price will come down quickly. So more seriously, after reading the article I really feel I understand better what to look for in an SSD. Thanks!
paesan - Tuesday, September 1, 2009 - link
Wow, does NE really think that anyone will buy the Intel drive at that price. OMG!!! Funny thing, it is in stock and it says limit 1 per customer. LolCList - Tuesday, September 1, 2009 - link
Obviously someone is buying them at that price or they'd lower it. The people who can't wait two or three weeks and are willing to be gouged for these drives are the ones that allow NewEgg to give us low margins on other products while not going out of business :Dravaneli - Tuesday, September 1, 2009 - link
I just decided to buy one and when I opened newegg i couldn't believe my eyes. I hope that is only because they have a few drives left, and once Intel pumps up some stock in the retailers the prices will go back to Intel's retail.Does anyone know what are the production capabilities of Intel's SSD factories? I don't want to wait a whole year until the market saturates.
LazierSaid - Tuesday, September 1, 2009 - link
This article was so good that Newegg doubled their X25M G2 prices overnight.medi01 - Tuesday, September 1, 2009 - link
Yep, very impressive advertisement indeed.HVAC - Tuesday, September 1, 2009 - link
I'd rather have ewoks in the sequels than Jar-jar ...Naccah - Tuesday, September 1, 2009 - link
Newegg's prices on all the Intel SSDs skyrocketed. The X-25 G2s are $499 now. Is this price a reflection of the high demand or did Intel change the price again?