Updated Benchmarks - Corsair, Gigaram, OCZ
With the update of the Memory Test Bench to the NVIDIA 7800 GTX and newer platform/video drivers, results from our previous benchmarks of 2GB kits in 1GB DIMMs: FAST 2GB DDR Kits from Corsair, Gigaram, and OCZ were not directly comparable. All benchmarks were rerun on these three memories so results could be directly compared to the six new 2GB kits.
Corsair TWINX2048-3500LLPRO (DDR433)
Gigaram 2GB Dual Channel PC-4200 (DDR533)
OCZ PC4000 2x1024MB EB Platinum (DDR500)
With the update of the Memory Test Bench to the NVIDIA 7800 GTX and newer platform/video drivers, results from our previous benchmarks of 2GB kits in 1GB DIMMs: FAST 2GB DDR Kits from Corsair, Gigaram, and OCZ were not directly comparable. All benchmarks were rerun on these three memories so results could be directly compared to the six new 2GB kits.
Corsair TWINX2048-3500LLPRO (DDR433)
Corsair TWINX2048-3500LLPRO (DDR433) - 2x1GB Double-Bank | |||||||
CPU Ratio at 2.4GHz | Memory Speed |
Memory Timings & Voltage |
Quake3 fps |
Sandra UNBuffered | Sandra Standard Buffered |
Super PI 2M places (time in sec) |
Wolfenstein - Radar - Enemy Territory fps |
12x200 | 400DDR | 2-3-2-7 2.5V 1T |
536.3 | INT 2540 FLT 2687 |
INT 6103 FLT 6036 |
82 | 117.8 |
11x218 | 436DDR | 2-3-2-7 2.6V 1T |
545.1 | INT 2704 FLT 2861 |
INT 6433 FLT 6363 |
82 | 118.5 |
10x240 | 480DDR | 2.5-3-2-7 2.7V 1T |
551.7 | INT 2862 FLT 3007 |
INT 6698 FLT 6614 |
81 | 119.5 |
10x246 (2.46GHz) |
Highest Mem Speed DDR 492 |
2.5-3-2-7 2.7V 1T |
563.8 | INT 2928 FLT 3110 |
INT 6832 FLT 6813 |
80 | 122.6 |
Gigaram 2GB Dual Channel PC-4200 (DDR533)
Gigaram 2GB Dual Channel PC-4200 (DDR533) - 2x512Mb Double-Bank | |||||||
CPU Ratio at 2.4GHz | Memory Speed |
Memory Timings & Voltage |
Quake3 fps |
Sandra UNBuffered | Sandra Standard Buffered |
Super PI 2M places (time in sec) |
Wolfenstein - Radar - Enemy Territory fps |
12x200 | 400DDR | 2-3-2-7 2.5V 1T |
537.9 | INT 2536 FLT 2687 |
INT 6072 FLT 6028 |
82 | 117.4 |
11x218 | 436DDR | 2.5-3-2-7 2.7V 1T |
544.3 | INT 2685 FLT 2822 |
INT 6424 FLT 6362 |
82 | 118.4 |
10x240 | 480DDR | 2.5-3-2-7 2.8V 1T |
550.7 | INT 2796 FLT 2895 |
INT 6703 FLT 6628 |
81 | 119.8 |
9x267 | 533DDR | 3-3-3-7 2.9VV 1T |
549.8 | INT 3012 FLT 3237 |
INT 6964 FLT 6890 |
80 | 120.5 |
9x278 (2.45GHz) |
Highest Mem Speed DDR 556 |
3-4-3-7 3.0V 1T |
562.3 | INT 3154 FLT 3346 |
INT 7216 FLT 7163 |
77 | 121.9 |
OCZ PC4000 2x1024MB EB Platinum (DDR500)
OCZ PC4000 2x1024MB EB Platinum (DDR500) - 2x512Mb Double-Bank | |||||||
CPU Ratio at 2.4GHz | Memory Speed |
Memory Timings & Voltage |
Quake3 fps |
Sandra UNBuffered | Sandra Standard Buffered |
Super PI 2M places (time in sec) |
Wolfenstein - Radar - Enemy Territory fps |
12x200 | 400DDR | 2-3-2-7 2.5V 1T |
536.6 | INT 2643 FLT 2698 |
INT 6089 FLT 6020 |
82 | 117.5 |
11x218 | 436DDR | 2-3-2-7 2.7V 1T |
545.8 | INT 2709 FLT 2846 |
INT 6409 FLT 6389 |
82 | 118.5 |
10x240 | 480DDR | 2.5-3-2-7 2.6V 1T |
553.6 | INT 2848 FLT 2967 |
INT 6705 FLT 6631 |
81 | 120.0 |
9x267 | 533DDR | 2.5-3-2-7 2.7V 1T |
553.4 | INT 3075 FLT 3150 |
INT 6985 FLT 6900 |
80 | 121.0 |
9x275 (2.48GHz) |
Highest Mem Speed DDR 550 |
3-3-2-7 2.7V 1T |
574.2 | INT 3207 FLT 3362 |
INT 7199 FLT 7043 |
76 | 124.5 |
51 Comments
View All Comments
PrinceGaz - Monday, January 23, 2006 - link
"... 2GB also makes sense for the OS future. With Vista coming and 2GB, the new memory recommendation for the new OS, you will be set for Vista."I was under the impression that the minimum is expected to be 512MB, and that 1GB will be recommended for good responsiveness under normal use. Having said that, I would personally choose 2GB for any new system as pairs of 1GB DDR (and of course DDR2) modules are now readily available and competitively priced. Unfortunately most big-name OEM systems are still shipping with either 512MB, or if you're lucky 1GB.
bigtoe36 - Monday, January 23, 2006 - link
Being honest we have had some supply issues, and some issues regarding supply that are out of our control. We do have stock and will have more real soon.ocztony
bigtoe36 - Monday, January 23, 2006 - link
This was to counter any moans about availability before they were posted.emilyek - Monday, January 23, 2006 - link
You guys tested the worst GSKILL kit.Their pc4000 2 gig kit (speed-binned version of that kit) is the same price as the 2-3-2-5 chip ($200) and will do DDR580
Their $250 kit 2-3-2-5 would contend with the Mushkin and the Crucial at a much lower cost.
Wesley Fink - Monday, January 23, 2006 - link
The Silver Editors Choice Corsair 4000PT, and the OCZ PC4000 Gold and PC4000GX XTC, also based on UCCC chips, are all in the $205 to $230 price range for the 2GB kit from e-tailers. So $250 for a UCCC kit seems in line but hardly a bargain.As for testing the worst G. Skill, we asked all the memory manufacturers to supply their "best" 2GB kit for our roundup. The manufacturers decided what to supply, and we expect Enthusiast memory makers to know what is best in their line.
irev210 - Monday, January 23, 2006 - link
The crucial memory is amazing memory.I was able to get it stable at 3-3-3-8 @ 300mhz, but you really need to spend some time on the settings, it is VERY picky memory. Both tras and drive strength play huge factory in memory stability.
Yes, it is suspected that due to really high RMA they discontinued, however what anandtech doesnt report is what actually happens to the memory.
Even at 2.8vcore or less PLUS active cooling, 1 2 or 3 months down the line your memory will just start dying.
Thinks like memtest86 will check out fine, but then while gaming, your rig will just lock up. Random bluescreens, random lockups...
There is a big story to these ballistix, it is too bad they simply have a HUGE rate of failure. Do a ddr2 roundup, then you will see how many people use micron fatbodies for their high performance ddr2 memory. You dont see that with the high density memory, and obviously i suspect due to stability issues.
My advice for memory is the g.skill F1-4000USU2-2GBHZ based on samsung ram, it has been doing well, and g.skill has awesome customer service.
I personally am going to wait for ddr2 before going with 1gb sticks, then ballistix 2gb set is on my list. But that is just me.
Bull Dog - Monday, January 23, 2006 - link
I'm another Ballistix memory user here. I ran mine at 2.75v the whole time and they just died after a while. Screw you Crucial/Micron. I will NEVER buy your products AGAIN. (I don't care if they have zero problems eitehr.gooser - Monday, January 23, 2006 - link
Now what about the tracers?? I just purchased the 2 GB tracers last week knowing about the issues with the regular ballistix after a couple of months. I have read that the tracers use a higher quality power modulator, thus dont have the same problem. Anyone?lopri - Monday, January 23, 2006 - link
Lots of work and outstanding comments. Thanks. This review, along with the Part I, is significant in that it puts an end to the 1GB system memory standard. It's declaring that an *era* of 2GB system memory is finally here.However, with these super high-clocking 1G sticks (512MB sticks also for that matter), there is one *realer* question that's haunting my mind. With the current crop of DDR memory reaching speed of DDR550~DDR600, one has to wonder - What's the good if CPUs can't handle the speed of memory?
Yes, I'm questioning the capability of A64/Opteron's memory controller. Because even the best current AMD CPUs often fail to keep up with the speed of memory. You've got a PC4800 DDR memory? Good luck, pray your CPU can run it at that speed. This issue is, at least for me, very real. I just don't see the point of high-clocking memory when the truth is CPUs' memory controllers are the limit. (And to some extent motherboards, of course)
In the light of this, would it be possible for you to test the quality of each revision of AMD CPUs' memory controllers? Preferably with recent cores - namely, Venice, San Diego, Toledo, Manchester and their Opteron equivalents. The more detailed, the better. Rev E3, E6, E4, and even the steppings.
While reading this excellent review, I couldn't shake the issue of memory controller off my head. These days a stick of RAM seems only as good as the CPU's memory controller it relies on. Unless one is just happy to see her/his RAM passing memtest @DDR600 all day long.
Again, thanks for your hard work on this review, Wesley. However, I'd really like to hear from you about the issue that I'm bringing here. I'd much appreciate it.
lop
dlerious - Monday, January 23, 2006 - link
If my CPU can't keep up with my RAM, I just drop the multiplier (and/or divider) down until I find the point where both run as high as possible at the voltage and temps I'm comfortable with.