Gigabyte's i-RAM: Affordable Solid State Storage
by Anand Lal Shimpi on July 25, 2005 3:50 PM EST- Posted in
- Storage
File Copy and Archive Performance
The one area where the i-RAM truly offered impressive performance was when copying files on the i-RAM itself, mainly because a file copy is mostly an I/O bound process.300MB File Copy | |||||
Time in Seconds (Lower is Better) |
|||||
Gigabyte i-RAM (4GB) | 25.25s |
||||
Western Digital Raptor (74GB) | 77.689s |
Copying a 300MB folder containing the Firefox source code from the Raptor to itself took about 77 seconds, yielding just under 4MB/s. Doing the same on the i-RAM took about 25 seconds, resulting in an average transfer rate of about 12MB/s. Note that both the Raptor and the i-RAM were far from their peak theoretical transfer rates, indicating that even the i-RAM is susceptible to some sort of performance overhead.
Next up? Copying a 693MB iso from the drive to itself:
693MB File Copy | |||||
Time in Seconds (Lower is Better) |
|||||
Gigabyte i-RAM (4GB) | 6.922s |
||||
Western Digital Raptor (74GB) | 26.304s |
The i-RAM averaged around 100MB/s and copied the file in 6.922 seconds. The Raptor did so in 26.305 seconds at an average of 26.3MB/s.
Finally, we copied our 1.7GB Battlefield 2 install directory:
1.76GB File Copy | |||||
Time in Seconds (Lower is Better) |
|||||
Gigabyte i-RAM (4GB) | 31.719s |
||||
Western Digital Raptor (74GB) | 95.953s |
Archive operations are also a lot quicker on the i-RAM. Here's how long it took to create a RAR archive of our Firefox source folder:
WinRAR Archive Creation | |||||
Time in Seconds (Lower is Better) |
|||||
Gigabyte i-RAM (4GB) | 57s |
||||
Western Digital Raptor (74GB) | 70s |
Un-archiving a 382MB RAR set provided a much closer competition between the Raptor and the i-RAM:
WinRAR Archive Extraction | |||||
Time in Seconds (Lower is Better) |
|||||
Gigabyte i-RAM (4GB) | 15s |
||||
Western Digital Raptor (74GB) | 19s |
133 Comments
View All Comments
ceefka - Tuesday, July 26, 2005 - link
That and/or having the possibility to install very large amounts of RAM (like 32GB) on your motherboard and BIOS settings to decide how much of that is non-volatile.I have a feeling this is a transitional product that while being a very nice add on to your current system, will become obsolete in 4 to 5 years. If I had to capture loads of high sampled audio (96/24), I'd want one now, though.
Furen - Monday, July 25, 2005 - link
I was expecting something closer to the $50 price mentioned at computex... It would have been a nice device to tinker around with, but at that price (plus the price of ram) I dont think most of us will get it.weazel1 - Sunday, November 4, 2012 - link
why they have to waste pci bus speeds and run though a sata chip beyound me it should directly conect to the pci bus have its own bois and run as full fleached ram or as normal ram with a redirect to being a hdd heack u have ram disk software idea the drive is pretty useless as permenment storage why no1 could see this i do not know