System Performance

Not all motherboards are created equal. On the face of it, they should all perform the same and differ only in the functionality they provide - however, this is not the case. The obvious pointers are power consumption, POST time and latency. This can come down to the manufacturing process and prowess, so these are tested.

For Z690 we are running using Windows 10 64-bit with the 21H2 update.

Power Consumption

Power consumption was tested on the system while in a single MSI GTX 1080 Gaming configuration with a wall meter connected to the power supply. Our power supply has ~75% efficiency > 50W, and 90%+ efficiency at 250W, suitable for both idle and multi-GPU loading. This method of power reading allows us to compare the power management of the UEFI and the board to supply components with power under load, and includes typical PSU losses due to efficiency. These are the real-world values that consumers may expect from a typical system (minus the monitor) using this motherboard.

While this method for power measurement may not be ideal, and you feel these numbers are not representative due to the high wattage power supply being used (we use the same PSU to remain consistent over a series of reviews, and the fact that some boards on our testbed get tested with three or four high powered GPUs), the important point to take away is the relationship between the numbers. These boards are all under the same conditions, and thus the differences between them should be easy to spot.

Power: Long Idle (w/ GTX 1080)

Power: OS Idle (w/ GTX 1080)

Power: Prime95 Blend (w/ GTX 1080)

Non-UEFI POST Time

Different motherboards have different POST sequences before an operating system is initialized. A lot of this is dependent on the board itself, and POST boot time is determined by the controllers on board (and the sequence of how those extras are organized). As part of our testing, we look at the POST Boot Time using a stopwatch. This is the time from pressing the ON button on the computer to when Windows starts loading. (We discount Windows loading as it is highly variable given Windows-specific features.)

Non UEFI POST Time

DPC Latency

Deferred Procedure Call latency is a way in which Windows handles interrupt servicing. In order to wait for a processor to acknowledge the request, the system will queue all interrupt requests by priority. Critical interrupts will be handled as soon as possible, whereas lesser priority requests such as audio will be further down the line. If the audio device requires data, it will have to wait until the request is processed before the buffer is filled.

If the device drivers of higher priority components in a system are poorly implemented, this can cause delays in request scheduling and process time. This can lead to an empty audio buffer and characteristic audible pauses, pops, and clicks. The DPC latency checker measures how much time is taken processing DPCs from driver invocation. The lower the value will result in better audio transfer at smaller buffer sizes. Results are measured in microseconds.

Deferred Procedure Call Latency

Board Features, Test Bed and Setup CPU Performance, Short Form
Comments Locked

40 Comments

View All Comments

  • shabby - Thursday, June 16, 2022 - link

    I'll bet there will be an intel gpu review though...
  • erotomania - Thursday, June 16, 2022 - link

    Intel GPU review before an Nvidia 3000 review?

    No Starfighter doesn't count!
  • shabby - Thursday, June 16, 2022 - link

    Sponsored review, you can count on it.
  • PlextorPro - Thursday, June 16, 2022 - link

    Intel GPU.........WHAT???
    You sound like a real enthusiast.....NOT!
  • mode_13h - Thursday, June 23, 2022 - link

    > #1 GPU review site on earth forever

    There have long been sites with comparable or even more comprehensive benchmarks, but the Deep Dives are what really set Anandtech apart.

    I hope someone is going to cover Hot Chips, this year. Can't they at least find some grad student or post doc who's going anyway to just liveblog about it?
  • Byte - Sunday, July 17, 2022 - link

    In all honestly all Nvidia does is enable another core complex and add 5% performance and charge 25% more.
  • bug77 - Thursday, June 16, 2022 - link

    I haven't read the review yet, but when the best you can say about a $600 board is that it's "a solid option", you know the board is a dud.
  • PeachNCream - Thursday, June 16, 2022 - link

    $600 huh? There must be a market for these moron-tier products, but it really would be nice if Anandtech reviewed something relevant to its dwindling community instead of just accepting whatever the OEMs dump onto them out of desperation to drum up hype and sales for fringe products almost none of us are interested in purchasing. Then again, who am I kidding? AT has had this sort of disconnect for quite a few years now.
  • PlextorPro - Thursday, June 16, 2022 - link

    Seriously, thank you for this review and in-depth evaluation!
    With the recent increase in popularity of MINI-ITX (SFF) systems, I would like to see an in-depth! review-comparison of the ASUS ROG Strix Z690-I with other MINI-ITX main boards. I have built a system with this MINI-ITX MB and am very pleased with the performance.

    It has a custom loop for cooling both the i9 12900K and an AMD RX 6800 GPU.
  • PlextorPro - Thursday, June 16, 2022 - link

    Seriously, thank you for this review and in-depth evaluation!
    With the recent increase in popularity of MINI-ITX (SFF) systems, I would like to see an in-depth review-comparison of the ASUS ROG Strix Z690-I with other MINI-ITX main boards. I have built a system with this MINI-ITX MB and am very pleased with the performance.

    It has a custom loop for cooling both the i9 12900K and an AMD RX 6800 GPU.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now