The USB-IF released a couple of new specifications recently - R2.1 for Type-C and R3.1 for USB-PD. The main update is the 'Extended Power Range' aspect that allows for delivery of up to 240W over Type-C setups supporting the relevant USB-PD profile.

The first USB Power Delivery (USB-PD) specification was released in 2012, and it has seen regular updates over the years. Initially, the focus was on enabling faster charging rates for smartphones and other such devices (which had been using proprietary charging schemes or the USB-BC battery charging specifications). After the release of the Type-C specifications in 2014, USB-PD became a hot topic again. In addition to charging, the attractiveness of a single port for both data and power I/O - particularly from the viewpoint of compact and slim notebooks - brought in the need to shore up the amount of power transferred between a source and a sink. Prior to the release of USB-PD R3.1, certifications from the USB-IF were in place for equipment capable of sourcing / sinking up to 100W (slightly lesser in practical circumstances). The newly released specifications refer to the modes in R3.0 as 'Standard Power Range' (SPR).

USB-PD R3.1 supports three charging models:

  • Fixed voltage
  • Programmable power supply (PPS), and
  • Adjustable voltage supply (AVS).

In the fixed voltage scheme, the Standard Power Range (SPR) mode supports 3A and 5A at 5V, 9V, 15V, and 20V. The 3A configuration supports between 15 and 60W. The 5A scheme requires a specific type of cable and can supply up to 100W. The new Extended Power Range (EPR) mode supports all voltage and current combinations of SPR, and also includes 5A supply at 28V, 36V, and 48V, allowing for support up to 240W.

In the programmable power supply (PPS) scheme available in SPR mode, currents are limited by the source and the cable's advertised capabilities. While the programmed voltage ranges track the ones in the fixed voltage scheme, the actual voltage may vary between 3.3V and 5.9V (for the 5V setting), 11V (for the 9V setting), 16V (for the 15V setting), and 21V (for the 20V setting) in steps of 20mV.

In the EPR mode, the AVS model allows for the voltage to be adjusted between 15V and one of 28V, 36V, or 48V in steps of 100mV depending on the negotiated EPR contract. The source and sink need to enter this specific EPR mode and the cable between them also needs to support EPR for these new voltages to be enabled.

EPR specifications keep safety in mind by allowing sources to scale back to 5V with a hard reset in case of unresponsive downstream sinks. The sink is also required to keep up periodic communication with 'keep-alive' messages to the source in this mode.

Cables supporting EPR need a compulsory electronic marking indicating EPR compatibility using 'EPR Mode Capable' bit set. Standard Power Range cables (SPR) support only up to 100W PD. Receptacles and cables supporting EPR need extra mechanical considerations to prevent shorting / arcing during the connection process. Towards this, the mechanical specifications of the cables as well as receptacles are getting updates. Arcing is possible during unplug operations, and this is being mitigated by length differences between the CC and VBUS pins (allowing the detection of disconnect events early enough to get the source to reduce the current prior to the full disconnection). A snubber capacitor at either cable end is recommended to help with this feature.

EPR enables supply of up to 5A at 48V, but the cables themselves need to support up to 53.65V, and the capacitors used need to be rated for 63V. The electronic marking on the cables are supposed to specify 50V/5A with visible EPR identification icons for end users.

Thumb drives sinking more than 3A or supporting USB4 operations are now mandated to respond to 'cable identity' queries from the host. Additional constraints / parametric adjustments have been made for cables to be fit for USB4 operations. The certification requirements for USB4 active cables have also been updated. They are now required to support Thunderbolt 3 capabilities fully (including Alternate Modes). Since these certification requirements are new, and do not specify updates for passive cables, it is possible that USB4 passive cables that support full capabilities when used with modern USB4 hosts may not operate at full speeds with legacy Thunderbolt 3 platforms.

USB-PD has enabled the use of a single Type-C port for both data and power I/O. In its previous avatar, this worked well for mobile devices such as smartphones and tablets - allowing them to even double up as power banks. In parallel, advances in Gallium Nitride (GaN) semiconductors have enabled the creation of very efficient and compact power electronics equipment.

A Compact 100W GaN Charger

Combined with the new USB-PD specifications allowing for up to 240W of power delivery, we will soon see USB-C chargers / adapters capable of powering desktop PCs (such as the Intel NUCs - even the gaming-focused models) and All-in-Ones. Currently, these systems still use wall-warts with DC-in barrel jacks to power the internal components. With solutions in sight for this inconvenience, such powerful systems are bound to see new applications.

Source: USB-IF

Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • Smell This - Saturday, May 29, 2021 - link

    There is all kinds of stuff to unpack in here. Thanks, AT.

    So ... USB-PD R3.1 EPR mode is 240W. Is it really? Or, is the sustained delivery 80% or 200w?
  • flyingpants265 - Saturday, May 29, 2021 - link

    What exactly is the point of this? Presumably we had DC power supplies before, why do I care if it's USB-C now? I don't see the benefit.
  • Lord of the Bored - Saturday, May 29, 2021 - link

    Because USB-C! We need one plug for everything and all other plugs are terrible forever(until USB-D comes out)! Using actual charger ports designed to carry high wattage is SO two years ago!
  • flyingpants265 - Sunday, May 30, 2021 - link

    I guess it makes sense to have a standardized power connector..
  • grant3 - Sunday, May 30, 2021 - link

    More power over USB-C lets us use more powerful laptops with USB-C docking stations.
    Standardized power over USB-C lets you use the same charger for many different devices.
    Standardized power over USB-C lets you more easily replace a lost or broken charger.

    You may not care about these features, but they don't hurt you either.
  • Pixelpusher6 - Sunday, May 30, 2021 - link

    The company I work at is a Dell shop. We provide our engineers with the Dell Precision. We have seen a very high failure rate with regards to the USB-C charging. The laptop will just cease to charge via the docking station / USB-C port, and it is not a result of physical damage or the docking station which are brand new WD19TBs. The fix is to have Dell replace the entire mainboard, which presents it's own set of problems sometimes. Thankfully the barrel connector was able to be used until we could get it repaired. I estimate 15% of these models have had or will have this issue over it's lifetime.

    When we started receiving the new model Latitudes and Precisions with the barrel connector absent, and USB-C charging the standard, it made me think. It's possible we received a bad batch of computers with QC issues. But given the problems experienced I am not overly excited for this transition.
  • grant3 - Sunday, May 30, 2021 - link

    If dell starts replacing 15% of its laptops' mainboards because of thunderbolt chip failures, those QC issues will disappear pretty damn fast.

    Right now the issue may seem smaller to dell because such a large % of customers only use the barrel connector for power.
  • milkywayer - Sunday, May 30, 2021 - link

    Dell isn’t exactly the leader in reliable hardware. Just because they outsource the board manufacturing to a terrible lowest bidder doesn’t mean it’s a usb c issue. My M1 MacBook Air has had zero issues charging via usb c in over 6 months.
  • edzieba - Tuesday, June 1, 2021 - link

    That's down to Dell, not USB Type C.

    Our Latitudes will die even if the Type C port is not being used at all! Chip near the top-left of the sys board pops, laptop refuses to boot on battery or under power unless a USB device is connected to the Type C port during boot (and will die a second or two after it is disconnected after booting).
  • arashi - Thursday, June 3, 2021 - link

    No issues with batches of USB-C HP so far, other than a batch of bad batteries.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now