Today Samsung LSI announced the new Exynos 1080 SoC, a successor to last year’s Exynos 980. This year’s 1080 is seemingly positioned a little above the 980 in terms of performance as we’re seeing some quite notable gains in features compared to the 980. It’s to be remembered that this is a “premium” SoC, meaning it’s not a flagship SoC, but it’s also not quite a mid-range SoC, fitting itself in-between those two categories, a niche which has become quite popular over the last 1-2 years.

The new SoC is defined by having a new 1+3+4 CPU configuration, as reasonably large GPU, and full 5G connectivity integrated, and is the first publicly announced SoC to be manufactured on Samsung’s new 5LPE process node.

Samsung Exynos SoCs Specifications
SoC Exynos 980 Exynos 1080
CPU 2x Cortex-A77 @ 2.2GHz
+ 6x Cortex-A55 @ 1.8GHz
1x Cortex-A78 @ 2.8GHz
+ 3x Cortex-A78 @ 2.6GHz
+ 4x Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz
GPU Mali G76MP5 Mali G78MP10
NPU Integrated NPU + DSP
5.7TOPS
Memory
Controller
LPDDR4X LPDDR4X / LPDDR5
Media 10bit 4K120 encode & decode
H.265/HEVC, H.264, VP9
10bit 4K60 encode & decode
H.265/HEVC, H.264, VP9
Modem Shannon Integrated 

(LTE Category 16/18)
DL = 1000 Mbps
5x20MHz CA, 256-QAM
UL = 200 Mbps
2x20MHz CA, 256-QAM

(5G NR Sub-6)
DL = 2550 Mbps
UL = 1280 Mbps
Shannon Integrated

(LTE Category 16/18)
DL = 1000 Mbps
5x20MHz CA, 256-QAM
UL = 200 Mbps
2x20MHz CA, 256-QAM

(5G NR Sub-6)
DL = 5100 Mbps
UL = 1280 Mbps


(5G NR mmWave)
DL = 3670 Mbps
UL = 3670 Mbps
WiFi Integrated 802.11ax (WiFi 6) Integrated 802.11ax (WiFi 6)
ISP Main: 108MP
Dual: 20MP+20MP
Main: 200MP
Dual: 32MP+32MP
Mfc.
Process
Samsung
8nm LPP
Samsung
5nm LPE

On the CPU side of things, this is the first time we’ve seen Samsung adopt a 1+3+4 CPU configuration, now adopting the Cortex-A78 architecture on the part of the performance cores. One core is clocked at 2.8GHz while the three others are running at 2.6GHz. Qualcomm had first introduced such a setup and it seems it’s become quite popular as it gives the benefit of both performance and power efficiency. The four big cores are accompanied by four Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0GHz.

On the GPU side of things, we’re seeing a quite large jump compared to the Exynos 980 as Samsung is now not only moving onto the new Mali-G78 microarchitecture, but is deploying double the number of cores. It’s possible that previous performance of these “premium” tier SoCs wasn't as well received as there was a large gap in performance compared to their flagship SoC counterparts, so Samsung employing a much larger GPU here is quite welcome, and still leaves room for a much larger configuration for their flagship SoC, which has yet to be announced.

Samsung now also includes a new generation NPU and DSP in the design, and quoted machine-learning inference power of 5.7TOPs which is again quite a sweet-spot for such an SoC.

The new modem now is capable of both 5G NR Sub-6 frequencies as well mmWave, something which was lacking in the Exynos 980. Samsung’s decision to deploy mmWave here is interesting given that outside of the US there’s very little deployment in terms of network coverage as sub-6GHz is being prioritised. Samsung adding this in in what’s supposed to be a more cost-effective SoC means that they’re actually expecting it to be used, which is going to be very interesting.

Multi-media wise, the specifications listed for the SoC show that it actually cut down on the MFC (Multi-Function Codec) decoder and encoder capabilities as it’s now only capable of 4K60 instead of 4K120 in the last generation – maybe a further cost optimisation.

The camera ISP capabilities have been improved, supporting now single camera sensors up to 200MP, and dual-sensor operation up to 32+32MP.

The most exciting thing about the SoC is its transition from an 8LPP DUV process to the new 5LPE EUV process. This is Samsung LSI’s and Samsung Foundry’s first announced 5nm chip which is going to garner a lot of attention when it comes to comparisons made against competitor SoCs on TSMC’s 5nm node. I do expect the Samsung process to be less dense, but we’ll have to wait out and see the actual performance and power differences between the two nodes.

Last year I had noted that the Exynos 980 looked like an extremely well balanced SoC and we did see it employed by third-party vendors such as VIVO, as well as more Samsung Mobile devices. The new Exynos 1080 look to be even stronger and solid in terms reaching a balance between performance and features and still trying to optimise things for cost.

Related Reading:

POST A COMMENT

55 Comments

View All Comments

  • AdrianBc - Thursday, November 12, 2020 - link

    I believe that the Linux claim must be correct.

    Unlike the Intel CPUs with few cores, which support "Turbo 2.0", i.e. all cores have the same maximum turbo frequency, the Intel CPUs with more cores, e.g. your Cascade Lake, support "Turbo 3.0", where each core might have a different maximum turbo frequency, which you see in your example.

    Intel invented "Turbo 3.0", as a step back from "Turbo 2.0", because otherwise they would have been force to sell most processors at a lower price, based on the worst core they happened to include. With "Turbo 3.0", they sell the processor at the higher price corresponding to the best core.
    Reply
  • ToTTenTranz - Thursday, November 12, 2020 - link

    Well considering the 8nm LPP is actually a "10nm++", it looks like they advanced not one but two process nodes at once, meaning this new midranger might actually be smaller than the older Exynos 980.

    Plus, depending on the memory configuration, this looks like it might be capable of performing better than the Exynos 990.

    If Samsung is putting this chip on the higher end Galaxy A smartphones then it's looking like that range will get even more popular.
    Reply
  • movax2 - Friday, November 13, 2020 - link

    Speaking of Samung, 5nm isn't a full node shrink over 7nm.
    https://en.wikichip.org/w/images/e/eb/5nm_densitie...
    Reply
  • James5mith - Thursday, November 12, 2020 - link

    "It’s possible that previous performance of these “premium” tier SoCs was as well received as there was a large gap in performance..."

    That sentence makes no sense.

    Did you mean "wasn't as well received" ?
    Reply
  • movax2 - Thursday, November 12, 2020 - link

    No AV1 format support because Samsung promotes MPEG 5 EVC. Reply
  • ksec - Thursday, November 12, 2020 - link

    If that was the case you would have seen EVC hardware decoding and encoding support on its chip. Reply
  • movax2 - Friday, November 13, 2020 - link

    it is the case. EVC isn't just ready... that's why there is no support yer.

    Samsung openly talks for EVC support. You can google it.
    Reply
  • dotjaz - Wednesday, November 18, 2020 - link

    And Samsung joined AOMedia as a "founding member". Reply
  • dotjaz - Wednesday, November 18, 2020 - link

    Samsung will support AV1 in their mobile chips. No EVC support will be added before that. Reply
  • dotjaz - Wednesday, November 18, 2020 - link

    That's so dumb. You do realise Samsung is a Board Member of AOMedia, and Exynos 1080 doesn't support EVC, right? Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now