AnandTech Storage Bench - Light

Our Light storage test has relatively more sequential accesses and lower queue depths than The Destroyer or the Heavy test, and it's by far the shortest test overall. It's based largely on applications that aren't highly dependent on storage performance, so this is a test more of application launch times and file load times. This test can be seen as the sum of all the little delays in daily usage, but with the idle times trimmed to 25ms it takes less than half an hour to run. Details of the Light test can be found here. As with the ATSB Heavy test, this test is run with the drive both freshly erased and empty, and after filling the drive with sequential writes.

ATSB - Light (Data Rate)

On the Light test, the SK Hynix Gold S31 SSDs all show decent overall performance, including when the test is run on a full drive. They aren't the fastest SATA drives to complete the test, but they trail by single-digit percentages.

ATSB - Light (Average Latency)ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Latency)

Average and 99th percentile latency is great for the larger two S31 models. The average latency for the 250GB model is a bit higher than for its larger siblings, but it's still ahead of the DRAMless drives. The 99th percentile latency score for the 250GB S31 is bad news: it's almost twice as bad as the DRAMless SSDs, though thankfully the S31's performance doesn't completely fall to pieces if the test is run on a full drive

ATSB - Light (Average Read Latency)ATSB - Light (Average Write Latency)

The average read latencies from the S31 drives is unremarkable. For reads, the 250GB model does stick out a bit from this crowd, but it isn't as much of an outlier as the DRAMless models.

ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Read Latency)ATSB - Light (99th Percentile Write Latency)

As with average read and write latencies, the 99th percentile latency subscores show that the S31 isn't really a problem for reads, and it is a minor issue for writing to the drive.

ATSB - Light (Power)

The SK Hynix Gold S31 drives are essentially tied with the DRAMless SSDs for lowest energy usage over the course of the Light test.

AnandTech Storage Bench - Heavy Random Performance
Comments Locked

22 Comments

View All Comments

  • jabber - Friday, November 15, 2019 - link

    I think the thing is we are now at the point of diminishing returns. I find it hard to tell the everyday difference between running a desktop on a 550MBps SATA or a 3000MBps NVMe (NVMe was a real disappointment for the boost it gives). 20+ years ago if I got another 5FPS in Quake I could tell. Now if my games jump from 130FPS to 140FPS...meh.

    I was upgrading my CPU every 6 months at one point many years ago. Now it's lucky if i change it every 6 years...
  • Samus - Friday, November 15, 2019 - link

    Actually a pretty impressive drive. The steady state performance is excellent. When I'm pushing out images to new PC's it's ridiculous a lot of the SSD's bottleneck even the network connection (which is realistically around 160MB/sec via (1Gbps Multicast) as you see it write VERY fast for the first half of a 15GB image then fall off.

    Imaging over USB 3.0 is totally brutal and only slightly faster than via the network. The SSD's are a mix of Intel OEM 540/545s drives and Micron 1100/1300 OEM drives, depending on the vendor. HP seems to use the Intel and Dell the Micron's. They're such shit all around drives for my job, but as you can imagine the users don't care because they're writing maybe a few GB a day via Outlook OST caching and general paging in Windows.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now