Power Consumption and Thermal Performance

The power consumption at the wall was measured with a 1080p display being driven through the HDMI port. In the graphs below, we compare the idle and load power of the ASRock DeskMini 110 with other low power PCs evaluated before. For load power consumption, we ran Furmark 1.12.0 and Prime95 v27.9 together. The numbers are what one might expect for the combination of hardware components in the machine.

Idle Power Consumption

Load Power Consumption (Prime95 + FurMark)

Our thermal stress routine starts with the system at idle, followed by 30 minutes of pure CPU loading. This is followed by another 30 minutes of both CPU and GPU being loaded simultaneously. After this, the CPU load gets removed, allowing the GPU to be loaded alone for another 30 minutes. The various clocks in the system as well as the temperatures within the unit are presented below.

According to the official specifications, the Tcase of the Core i5-6500 is 71C, and the BIOS performance curves are set to ensure that the processor doesn't go beyond that even under stress. Therefore, we see very strange package power / at-wall power consumption in the pure CPU loading case. However, things do stabilize at a higher power number when both the CPU and the GPU are loaded together.

Another important aspect to keep note of while evaluating small form-factor PCs is the chassis temperature. Using the Android version of the FLIR One thermal imager, we observed the chassis temperature after the CPU package temperature reached the steady state value in the above graph.

We have additional thermal images in the gallery below. The chassis temperatures are not a big concern even under extreme loading conditions.

HTPC Aspects - Network Streaming Efficiency Concluding Remarks
Comments Locked

85 Comments

View All Comments

  • Lolimaster - Saturday, June 11, 2016 - link

    I would really love a review of the i7 6700T 35w.

    i7 6700K is only 17% faster on average without that nice tdp. Powerconsumption idle/load/typical use/temps. Would really appreciate it.
  • prisonerX - Tuesday, June 14, 2016 - link

    A reasonably priced case with built-in passive CPU heatsink would be a nice complement in that review. With Skylake about the only real benefit is the practicality of silent PCs.
  • prisonerX - Tuesday, June 14, 2016 - link

    This ticks a lot of boxes:small size, 12V power, Skylake. But $130 for a motherboard, a generic power brick and a simple case? Seriously?
  • 8steve8 - Saturday, July 9, 2016 - link

    I know right? It should be like $300 considering the skull canyon NUC is over $600 and can only handle a 45w CPU... With a terrible (loud) cooler.

    There is nothing that competes with this: Skylake 65 W with this size.

    If only Intel would release a socketed Skylake 65w CPU/iGPU with eDRAM.
  • ES_Revenge - Friday, June 17, 2016 - link

    Really don't understand the point to STX. Has zero slots, okay that makes it even smaller than ITX but is there really a need for it? The NUC/mini-PC type jobbies like the NUC, Cubi, Liva, etc. seem to have their market covered. If you really want there are some very small mini-ITX cases (some that even only hold thin mini-ITX) and don't end up using the slot so the space "wasted" because of it isn't that much.

    For example Antec's ISK 110 is very small, it's a bit bigger than this but it uses mini ITX boards (with no slot usability) which are available all over the place. It just doesn't seem like we need another form factor to be between mini ITX and the NUC-type machines, does it?

    I'd rather mini DTX have taken off that this. I just don't think there's a need for mini-ITX minus like 5cm
  • 8steve8 - Saturday, July 9, 2016 - link

    Most NUCs have a 15W or less CPU meant for laptops... With a laptop style heatsink/fan.

    This takes a 65w CPU and a quieter heatsink/fan.

    Imagine you want a very high performance desktop, but also want it as small as possible. I realize most commenters on this site are obsessed with game performance, but if you don't care about playing the latest game, then this pretty close to the perfect high performance small desktop workstation.
  • 8steve8 - Saturday, July 9, 2016 - link

    This is much smaller than even tiny itx PCs ... Also front ports without internal wires/connectors!
  • jaydee - Thursday, June 30, 2016 - link

    The power draw for the MSI Cubi 2 Plus vPro max load power draw (Prim95 + FurMark) really can't be right. It's a 35W TDP i5-6500T, and according to the chart is measuring 10W higher than the 65W i5-6500 PC in this review?

    The i5-6500T 35W PC almost has to be closer to half of the 102W shown here (which was taken from the MSI Cubi 2 Plus vPro main article).
  • butchooka - Friday, August 12, 2016 - link

    Can please someone confirm tha it is possible to install 15mm high HDDs?
    Would be a nice to put 2*4TB 2,5 drives +m2-SSD in it.

    Found nowhere information about possible high of drives in this case, or pics showing there is enogh space. All tests only use ssd drives with 6/9,5mm height. Asrock only provides that it has space for 2 drives
  • james.shallcross - Tuesday, September 20, 2016 - link

    7mm - no problem
    9.5mm - will JUST fit
    15mm - will not fit

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now